Africa’s stock-market recovery is providing a brighter headline than many companies’ financing experience. The OECD’s Africa Capital Markets Report 2026, published on 6 November, describes improving markets that still offer businesses a limited route to patient capital.

The distinction matters for entrepreneurs making investment decisions well beyond a trading screen. A higher valuation for an existing listed company does not automatically provide another manufacturer, distributor or creative business with money to expand. The report’s central challenge is how to turn financial-market momentum into broader access.

What the new figures show

According to the OECD, African equity market capitalisation grew 49% in 2025, against 21% globally. It puts the continent’s domestic capital base at US$4.4 trillion, representing 0.9% of global financial assets. Those figures describe different measures: stock-market value and a wider pool of domestic capital should not be added together.

The organisation says markets remain small, trading can be thin and ownership concentrated. Corporate financing is dominated by syndicated loans, while bond issuance remains limited. Its policy priorities include a broader investor base, stronger governance and a wider range of investable assets.

Reuters’ reporting on the study adds detail to the company-funding picture. It reports estimated outstanding market-based corporate debt of US$211 billion at the end of 2025, with six countries accounting for 80% of the total. Only 17% of corporate debt issued during 2025 was denominated in local currencies. These are report-based estimates, not a census of every business’s borrowing.

From a market recovery to a usable funding route

The practical question is what kind of money a business needs, for how long, and on which terms. Equity brings an ownership relationship. Debt creates repayment obligations. A company with an unpredictable development cycle may need a different arrangement from one with contracted, recurring revenues.

For a film distributor, for example, borrowing against uncertain future receipts is a different proposition from financing equipment supported by an established rental business. That is an illustration of the financing problem, rather than a finding about particular African media companies.

Currency also changes the calculation. A borrower earning local-currency revenue but repaying foreign-currency debt has to consider the effect of exchange-rate movements alongside the advertised interest rate. A cheaper-looking loan can therefore carry risks that its headline price does not reveal.

The domestic-finance discussion is already visible in African policy meetings. In a 6 November account of the Africa Financial Summit, held in Luanda on 3–4 November, Uganda’s finance ministry described discussions about mobilising savings, pensions and insurance assets. It also highlighted protecting savers and exploring local-currency financing. The account records policy discussions, rather than an announced financing facility for individual companies.

What would demonstrate progress?

RIM’s assessment is that access should be judged through transactions and terms, alongside market size. Useful questions include whether a wider range of companies can raise funding, whether maturities match investment needs, and whether the costs of preparing an issue are proportionate to the amount raised.

More participation also demands trustworthy information. An investor needs a credible account of how money will be used and repaid or rewarded. For businesses, preparing that information is part of becoming finance-ready; a favourable continental statistic cannot substitute for it.

This connects with RIM’s coverage of the AfDB’s planned Paris diaspora initiative. Inviting African-origin investors into development finance creates a further test: whether the proposed opportunities are understandable, accountable and suited to their actual risks.

Comparisons will also need to separate changes in market prices from new money raised. A rise in the value of shares already in circulation benefits their holders differently from a new issue that finances a company’s investment. Tracking both would make it easier to see whether the recovery is widening opportunity, rather than treating every increase in market value as an equivalent gain for business funding.

The OECD report supplies a new benchmark for that conversation. The next evidence to watch is whether financial-market improvement produces more practical financing choices for businesses across different countries and sectors.

*Illustration: AI-generated conceptual artwork about financing connections. The image is not a data chart or a photograph of a financial institution.*

Why this matters

African businesses need funding that matches their revenues, investment plans and operating currencies. Stronger stock-market valuations can coexist with narrow borrowing options. For African-origin entrepreneurs and diaspora investors, the report makes the quality and reach of finance the key questions: who can access it, on what terms, and with what accountability? Progress should expand productive investment while protecting the people whose savings provide the capital.

Sources

Topics: Africa · OECD · Capital markets · Business finance · Domestic investment

← All news & insights